Talk:The Bart Wants What It Wants/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 20:52, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]- There is one deadlink
More to come Ruby2010 comment! 21:20, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Wikilink Rainier Wolfcastle in lead
- You can remove Canada in the lead (I think most readers know where Toronto is; wikilink the city for those less informed) ;)
- Wikilink characters in polt (Homer etc)
- The plot seems a little disconnected (why did Homer steal the Olympic torch?) The section could use some expansion (it's still below the basic word limits)
- "even though it Canada is not mentioned"
- "features the Simpsons first travel to Canada" -> the Simpsons'
- "It was written by Frink and, according to Selman, the line became very popular with the staff..." I think you should change the first "It" to "the line" and change second "the line" to "it"
- Make sure sentences with quotes end with citations
- Refs 2 and 10: page number?
- Remove caps on ref 8
On hold for seven days. Thanks, Ruby2010 comment! 21:53, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! Queenieacoustic (talk) 10:28, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
- Looks good except: Refs 2 and 10: page number? Ruby2010 comment! 16:25, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
- The refs were added by another editor. I've asked him if he could provide with the page numbers, but he hasn't responded yet, so there's really nothing I can do for now unfortunately. Queenieacoustic (talk) 21:50, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- User:Scorpion0422 likely didn't include the page numbers because they weren't available. Page numbers are not always available on Newsbank. And besides, page numbers are optional per Wikipedia:Citing sources. Theleftorium (talk) 23:00, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Well, I'm satisfied then. Pass for GA. Nice work, Ruby2010 comment! 03:06, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
- Looks good except: Refs 2 and 10: page number? Ruby2010 comment! 16:25, 30 July 2011 (UTC)