Talk:The Badger Herald

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I added several references from a project I did on the 1960s Badger Herald/Daily Cardinal and the bombing. Previously, this entry made it appear as if the Cardinal randomly supported violence against University buildings, leading to the start of the Herald. This may be somewhat misleading to readers who do not know about the widespread campus protests at the time. I therefore tried to give some context to why the Cardinal supported the violence by including some primary sources regarding the political climate at the paper, the campus, and other newspapers at the time. This is definitely not to condone the paper's actions, only to give it context (and more references, as this article needed some). I also squarely placed the Cardinal's stance in favor of violence as ending in the late 60s/early 70s, so as not to mislead current-day readers about the paper's modern day editorial positions regarding political violence. Chris_hhh99 —Preceding undated comment added 15:11, 18 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]

I have removed the statement that the paper was founded to counter the liberal bias in the media in Madison at the time. It would more likely be true to state that it was founded to counter the liberal bias of The Daily Cardinal. However, that statement would have difficulty with meeting the POV standard. Also, the statement that there was a liberal bias in media in Madison is incorrect. The morning city paper, The Wisconsin State Journal, was decidedly different in editorial approach than the self-described liberal The Capital Times published in the afternoon. The radio and television stations can accurately be described as reporting the news without taking editorial positions. This is particularly true of top rated WISM radio which on the hour extensively reported local and national news without injecting a political point of view. Kyle Andrew Brown 03:37, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The part about Rocky Raccoon seems POV too. It's actually not that clever.

I go to the University of Wisconsin and I definitely would not say the Herald is "considered the primary student newspaper." My feeling is that the Cardinal and Herald are viewed as being equal competitors. Both are daily and both receive attention as being one of UW's papers-- neither is considered "primary." Additionally, while circulation statistics are sound, it's very difficult to get an accurate gauge of "readership," so I think this should be removed unless someone can provide a citation. TWX1905 19:05, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It's hard to guage readership when both papers are free.--Hraefen ^Talk 19:15, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed here, too. Rocky Raccoon isn't clever, and neither of the comics cited are very good or "favorites" by any means...I smell a plant.24.208.27.108 06:48, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:The Badger Herald/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The history section needs to be split into subsections. It is currently too long. – Lordmontu _{(talk) • (contribs)} 20:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 20:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 07:57, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Badger Herald. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:41, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]