Jump to content

Talk:The Atrocity Exhibition

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

RE/Search edition

[edit]

The RE/Search edition was published in 1990, not 1984.[1] They did publish a book about Ballard in general (RE/Search #8/9) in 1984 so maybe that's the reason for the earlier date. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 05:23, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ballard--atrocity2.jpg

[edit]

Image:Ballard--atrocity2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ballard--atrocity2.jpg

[edit]

Image:Ballard--atrocity2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:52, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doubleday

[edit]

Why no mention of the shredding of the first edition from doubleday? ill try to add it, its a notable nonpublication of a book. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 21:56, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Joy Division

[edit]

Just saw the part on Joy Division, should it be mentioned that it was the book Ian Curtis read just before he hung himself —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.44.34.43 (talk) 20:52, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Love & Napalm

[edit]

The short story Love & Napalm was actually first published, I think, in the last number of Klactoveedsedsteen, a Little Mag from German cut-up writer, publisher and translator Carl Weissner. In is in Klactoveedsedsteen's last issue, called Klacto/23 International, which was published (it seems) in 1967 and - very probably not in 1969, as is often stated, because of the wrong (ha) date September 17, 1899. It is clearly visible on the cover of the mag (designed as a newspaper) on a photo of the issue on Jed Birmingham's Reality Studio site (from the Reality Studio/Klactoveedsedsteen entry).--Radh (talk) 11:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t think that this can be right. For one thing, the photo of Klacto/23 International clearly shows a reference to the forthcoming German publication of “The Atrocity Exhibition” by Melzer in 1970, so it surely can't date from 1967! There do seem to have been some differences between (i) the original Klacto/23 - published in 1967, containing “Parenthetically 7 hertz” by William Burroughs but nothing by Ballard – and (ii) the variant edition Klacto/23 International published in 1969, containing “Love & Napalm” by Ballard and “The Invisible Generation” and “Abstract” by Burroughs. For info on these differences, see the brief history and contents of Klactoveedsedsteen magazine at the Harry Ransom Center website, and the extensive Burroughs bibliography by Brian E. C. Schottlaender.Mikkehh (talk) 20:31, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Following on from the above, I've now amended the publication details of a couple of the individual stories as per David Pringle's updated Ballard bibliography (which was included in the exhibition catalogue "Crash: Homage to J G Ballard", Gagosian Gallery, 2010).Mikkehh (talk) 19:44, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on The Atrocity Exhibition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:47, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]