Talk:The Astronomer (Vermeer)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts articles

Information on the painting

To someone who can be bothered to expand this page: try this site for ideas: [[1]] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by R160K (talk • contribs) 20:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Louvre

There is a dispute concerning how the painting entered the collection of the Louvre. As a donation or as a tax payment to the state. Opinions are welcome here...Modernist (talk) 03:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So far the only online sources I'm finding state that the painting was either sold or donated to the Louvre. If it was intended as a tax payment there needs to be a source to support the claim. JNW (talk) 04:20, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I re-added the reference by Barbiedrag that mentions inheritance tax, I'd like another source however...Modernist (talk) 04:24, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Found and added. JNW (talk) 04:32, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that addition, good find - the gift seems to be part of some complicated negotiations and not just something to clear up a tax liability...Modernist (talk) 04:35, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Funny how the health of the market determins the goodwill behind such things. Ceoil 22:09, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During the Nazi Years

I recently came across some info on this painting's history, but since I am not an expert I will leave it to others to determine if this is relevant for the article. The painting's whereabouts during the Nazi years was described in the book The Devil’s Diary: Alfred Rosenberg and the Stolen Secrets of the Third Reich by Robert K. Wittman an David Kinney (2016). Wittman is a noteworthy expert on recovering artworks stolen by the Nazis during World War II, and the book's subject, Alfred Rosenberg, was in charge of the Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg operation that is already mentioned in the article. The book describes that the painting was hidden for a few years in a salt mine near the village of Alt Aussee, Austria and was discovered by Allied investigators shortly after the end of the war. Hitler had apparently planned to keep it for his personal collection. This is described in Chapter 22 of the Wittman/Kinney book; sorry I can't provide precise page numbers because I was reading an e-book version that rearranged the original page numbers. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:09, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]