Talk:The Apprenticeship of Duddy Kravitz (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.

Canada: Quebec / Montreal / Cinema Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Montreal (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the joint Canadian film and cinema task force

Jewish culture Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish cultureTemplate:WikiProject Jewish cultureJewish culture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film vs. Book

Actually, the film is much better known, but the article title change is fine with me. I tend to agree that when a book comes first, it should take title precedence, but generally, it seems that Wikipedia convention is that when one item or person is more widely known than another, the widely known item / person gets the priority in article naming. Here is the policy: Generally, article naming should give priority to what the majority of English speakers would most easily recognize, with a reasonable minimum of ambiguity, while at the same time making linking to those articles easy and second nature. (Wikipedia:Naming conventions) Hu 23:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I've written elsewhere.[1] it may be that my Canadian upbringing has warped my perception. In this country, The Apprenticeship of Duddy Kravitz is taught at the high school and university levels and is included in both the New Canadian Library and Penguin Modern Classics series. I would say it ranks alongside Two Solitudes and The Stone Angel as one the most read and recognized titles in English language Canadian literature. While I obviously wouldn't expect it to have nearly the same stature outside the country, I am surprised to learn that the film is better known. In Canada, at least, it is very much overshadowed by the novel. Victoriagirl 19:23, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikipedia, we are dealing with popular culture when we discuss the demographics of viewers. In the US and Europe, which together supply twenty times more Wikipedia readers than Canada, the book would not be assigned reading, except very rarely, for example in a Canadian Literature university course. On the other hand, Richard Dreyfuss, got a big break with the film. TAoDK is known as the film where he got his first leading role. The next year he went on to make the blockbuster Jaws (film). By the way, I put Joshua Then and Now (film) nominated for Wikipedia Did You Know daily new articles feature: Template talk:Did you know#October 20. Hu 01:57, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No argument here... my last post was really meant as nothing more than an observation. I'm just extremely surprised that the film is so well known outside Canada. In this country it is very much overlooked, despite the popularity of the novel. Victoriagirl 02:06, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! Joshua Then and Now (film) has been selected and appeared in the Did You Know column on the Wikipedia main page. Hu 10:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is good news. Victoriagirl 18:50, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I had no idea this was made into a movie! The book is quite well known. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.30.159.102 (talk) 00:45, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The book is well-known in Canada. The film is well-known in the US, at least among film buffs. Shocked by the (relatively) low box office; hard to believe that constituted the highest-grossing Canadian film to that point. Don't know if my "second-run" ticket counts in the b.o. total. 2600:1004:B164:1C66:7429:C2C3:D261:F961 (talk) 02:30, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Duddykravitzfilm.jpg

Image:Duddykravitzfilm.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:29, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

when is the film set?

The book is from 1959, but that doesn't mean the film is also set in the 1950s. If there's any doubt, the plot synopsis should begin with when as well as who and what.ProfessorAndro (talk) 17:59, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ProfessorAndro: At one point a calendar shows April 1948. But the whole sequence at the Ste Agathe hotel, in the first third of the film, would presumably have been summer of 1947. Apart from the wall calendar, other facets of the film suggest the 1950s or even later. For example, Randy Quaid's character, in his speech when he says he wants to found an advocacy group for people with epilepsy, talks about the start of the gay rights movement, which I doubt he would have casually mentioned in the 1940s. Also the telephone technology looked later than the 1940s. But I wasn't alive back then so maybe I'm wrong. Mathew5000 (talk) 06:54, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The Apprenticeship of Duddy Kravitz (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]