Talk:The Apprentice (British TV series) series 12

This article was nominated for deletion on 27 September 2018. The result of the discussion was keep.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: The Apprentice UK / British Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Apprentice UK task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

Things needed for the Lead

The Lead will need to be amended over time, but we do need to know if the BBC scheduled it for Autumn in order to avoid clashing with the main sporting events of this Year and the EU Referendum in the UK. Any other info should be things of a significant nature; saying something happened and then adding in brackets around "(like in Series 10)" shouldn't be done. GUtt01 (talk) 23:50, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Info for Upcoming Episodes - What can go in and why

Please don't include these pieces of information for an upcoming episode, for the following reasons:

Task - Only include it in, if you have a Citation to prove that this is what the task is about. If it is stated without a citation, then look up one.
Team Setups - Don't include the information for this prior to the episode being broadcast. Wait until the episode has aired before doing so, as the setups might be changed by Lord Sugar, and the teaser at the end of the previous episode shouldn't be relied upon. The only time the candidates can be put into the episode's info is when it is the Interview Stage and the Final, when it can be fully confirmed who is in at those points in this year's competition.

Other pieces of info for the episode must be written after the broadcast of the episode. Do not include info on the winner if it is leaked out by a media website; Wikipedia is not designed to act like a spoiler for shows. If there is a leak, state in notes about this after the episode has been broadcast. GUtt01 (talk) 09:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't include information about a candidate who has left/quit the process, without providing proof. No citation equals deletion of this information. Also, "Quit/Left" should be after "Reward", not before "Task/Task Review". GUtt01 (talk) 09:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please note the following - If you should find information about this, leave it in HIDDEN TXT, until after the broadcast of the episode.GUtt01 (talk) 15:37, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Controversy - Candidate Alana Spencer

I think I might have found something that could be a possible controversy regarding a candidate, but want other people's opinions. It relates to a news article about Alana, and her making racist comments on social media. If people check it out, could they determine if it is significant enough to be included into the Controversy section (HIDDEN at the time of this being made)? GUtt01 (talk) 19:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Week 4 - Where "Left" should be

Please leave Left where it is from now on, as there is no need to move it up around Task & Task Review. It has in brackets when the candidate left and should not be moved around. Could Wiki editors, regardless of being registered or IP Users, refrain from moving it in future. Thank you. GUtt01 (talk) 15:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to move this, get general consensus from other editors first, okay? GUtt01 (talk) 15:02, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Minor change to weekly results table

Just from a readability point of view, despite it being probably assumable anyway, I'd propose an additional row to be added to the second row of the elimination chart that has week number added. Such as

Elimination chart
	Week/Episode (number)
Candidate	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12

The wording is up for suggestion. Just a thought really. eeveeman (talk) 09:33, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=The_Apprentice_(UK_series_twelve)&diff=prev&oldid=754593682

New performance chart

I implemented a new style performance chart, however this edit was immediately reversed with no discussion started. I have started one at Talk:The Apprentice (UK series fourteen)#New performance chart. Sr88, talk. 22:48, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]