This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Re the summary. There is no mention of the recap and that the episode is actually a continuation from episode 9. It is set in the present time and the Victorian sequences are only in Sherlock's head. It is not a Victorian themed episode. The point of the story was for Sherlock to solve a Victorian mystery to solve a modern one; ie Moriarty shooting himself in the head.REVUpminster (talk) 10:38, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This article has no section on the episode's critical reception currently. I would add some content on it, but I haven't watched this one and would like to avoid spoilers. I can post links to a selection of (probably) useful reviews though:
Rotten Tomatoes (aggregator; links to 40 reviews from different outlets)