Talk:The 23rd Psalm

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The 23rd Psalm article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The 23rd Psalm has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 4, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Television: Episode coverage / Lost Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Lost task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Centralized move discussion

Per WP:LOST/Episode guidelines, this page should be moved from The 23rd Psalm to The 23rd Psalm (Lost), to make it consistent with the other Lost episodes at Category:Lost episodes. Anyone interested in supporting or opposing this move, or who believes that a different suffix should be used (such as "(Lost episode)"), or who wishes to comment in any way, is encouraged to participate at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Lost/Episode guidelines#Name suffix. --Elonka 14:15, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

By the fact that this episode was nominated for an Emmy Award, that pretty clearly makes it notable. --El on ka 23:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The 23rd Psalm/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 00:32, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will review soon one of my favorite Lost episodes. Ruby2010 comment! 00:32, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments

One dab link needs fixing Y
The lead has a few minor problems; I fixed them here
The episode has an overall theme of redemption, and was written in a way it paralleled "Deus Ex Machina", the episode where the Nigerian airplane was first introduced. Not sure what you're trying to say here. The episode paralleled "Deus Ex Machina"? Make it more clear please
Find the proper wikilink for redemption
Italicize Entertainment Weekly (it's a magazine) Y

Just a few minor fixes needed above, and the article will be good to go. I'll place the review on hold for seven days. Thanks, Ruby2010 comment! 00:49, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Loks good. Pass for GA. Thanks, Ruby2010 comment! 20:22, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The 23rd Psalm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110304164958/http://abc.go.com/shows/lost/episode-detail/the-23rd-psalm/40666 to http://abc.go.com/shows/lost/episode-detail/the-23rd-psalm/40666

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:51, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]