Talk:Thatcher effect

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Cognitive science (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles

Untitled

"The illustration above depicts two identical photos" ... no, it doesn't! There are lots of copies of this article found by Google, plenty of which have the image -- is it original Wikipedia content or not? Anyway, this needs rephrasing and the image putting in somewhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.93.28.6 (talk)

Photo

I added an illustration. Does this agree with everyone? Alex Dodge 06:37, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It could maybe use dividing into clearer pairs, rather than an unexplained block of four pictures. --McGeddon (talk) 12:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Main Photo

I have reverted the sample photo to that of one Iain because the effect in the Margaret Tatcher photo is not pronounced at all (although it is fitting in terms of subject). —Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueStream (talk • contribs) 06:22, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Folks, this photo is just not cutting it. It either needs to be reprocessed or replaced with something better. For this to be an effective demonstration of the effect, it must HAVE the effect. Whoever did the editing here made it a little too obvious(Or it could be that it's just obvious when next to the unaltered version) - either way, it doesn't work. The site linking me here at a great example, and I'm sure there are plenty of other ones out and about. Please do better?

64.206.141.60 (talk) 05:46, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It does not work for me either.--Ancient Anomaly (talk) 18:55, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is simply not good enought, the mustache make it more evident that the reversed tampered photo is indeed tampered. Santropedro (talk) 23:00, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rhesus monkeys

I wonder about the accuracy of reporting a conjecture that a shared 30 million year old ancestor processed faces configurally, considering that it may evolve independently in various species which have a social component that find recognition of faces important. I'm going to change the wording to be more tentative, hopefully no-one objects. Ninahexan (talk) 05:06, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]