Talk:Thasmin

Thasmin has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 1, 2025. (Reviewed version).

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Doctor Who Low‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

"I have loved being with you, Yaz’: Doctor Who, Thasmin and brilliant lesbian futures"
"Casual queerness and desire lines in Doctor Who"
"'Martha Jones is a lesbian': Queer (re) interpretations of companions in Doctor Who"

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Thasmin/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 21:29, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 08:32, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saw this and would love to do review it. Unfortunatly I may not get around to writing the review for a few days due to both on and off wiki commitments Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 08:32, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to review it too, I should have been quicker. I hope you did Thasmin more justice than Chibnall did^[Joke]. Best of luck with the reviewing! DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 16:31, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Lead

Define ship for those unaware
- Done. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History

"This spawned considerable fan-works, including memes and slash fiction, which expanded the ship's popularity in the fandom" missing period
"Special episode "Revolution of the Daleks"" maybe list what its a special for
Series 13 is linked three times
- Fixed all three of these. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
section is quite long so maybe break it up with subheading
Ref 8 needs to be archived.

Reception

Ref 17 in prose is listed as "/Film" in the references is listed as "SlashFilm"

References

Cut the "| Radio Times" in the various Radio Times refs
- Done. Let me know if I missed any. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Overall

Checked odd numbered refs and everything lines up. That's all ping me when done. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 22:51, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@OlifanofmrTennant made changes where necessary. Let me know if the subheading works fine because finding a split is iffy. Additionally, ref 8 won't archive no matter how many times I try, so I'm not quite sure what to do for it. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 05:35, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If your using IA bot then just archive it manually Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:48, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@OlifanofmrTennant how do you do that? Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 18:56, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Go to Archive.org the way back machine is on the homepage just enter the link and then fill in the |archive-url parameter Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@OlifanofmrTennant done. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 19:16, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pokelego999: great! I'll do one last sweep and if nothing else pops up Ill pass it. Additionally due to the amount of good content you produce would you have any intrest it signing up for the 2025 wikicup? The rules have changed to allow late sign ups so you still can throught the year. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 00:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]