Talk:Texas Centennial half dollar/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 03:41, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 20:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I will review this article. Good luck.

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	No spelling or grammar issues.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Seems to comply with the MoS.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	References are all listed.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Everything has an inline citation.
	2c. it contains no original research.	No original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	No copyright violations.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	I don't think that there is anything else to cover.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	No unnecessary detail.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	There are no biases.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No edits on this article have ever been reverted.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	All images are fine to use.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Every image has a good and relevant caption.
	7. Overall assessment.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.