Talk:Terry A. Doughty

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

United States courts and judges Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Last paragraph

The last paragraph of this article is inaccurate. The physician it anonymously refers to is Dr. Peter McCullough, who is experienced, qualified and widely well-respected in the medical establishment. Pm1492 (talk) 17:13, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Phoebe Moody[reply]

It doesn't matter. Wiki prose does not allow us to opine on the opinions of others, even experts. Whether they are well respected requires citation in and of itself, which just ends up derailing the article, or marks clear bias and I can probably bet you that there are a whole mishmash of other experts who would claim otherwise. Deleted this last 3 paragraphs because it is wholly irrelevant. He blocked the medical worker mandate is good enough as written. 12.108.113.106 (talk) 06:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It most certainly does matter, because Wikipedia doesn't allow us to even refer to the "opinions of others", period. What is referred to must be factual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:200:C082:2EA0:118A:5137:CD20:7231 (talk) 03:29, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The source cited in 18 and 19, OpenVAERS, is not reputable. From their own FAQ, "OpenVAERS is a project developed by a small team of people with vaccine injuries or who have children with vaccine injuries." As such, unless the last paragraph can provide a corroborating source, it should be dropped as it advances an argument without proper evidence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:2890:4F20:81C6:5D44:C229:F51B (talk) 04:51, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New ruling

He just made a new ruling related to Covid-19. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 07:51, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Terry Doughty.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:26, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion on Prelim Injunction in St. of Missouri et. al. v Joseph R. Biden, Jr. et. al.

Is it appropriate to include a quote from an organization that salutes Voltaire in this opinion? Voltaire was a controversial anti-Christian figure who was arrested for speaking out against a Christian Society, and very possibly regularly blasphemed - a sin in a nation that tries to use revealed law as that to subject itself to. The United States was supposed to respect religion--as a matter of law (First Ammendment of Bill of Rights). The idea of separation of powers is rooted in the Magna Carta-before Voltaire's time-and would never have existed without the efforts of Cardinal Stephen Langton, an individual whose ecclesial education was rooted in natural law and revealed law. Our Bill of Rights is rooted in the concepts of the Magna Carta, and surely, many of the nation's founders were formed by Western Christian Legal Principles (to include Magna Carta, Natural Law, and Revealed Law). 174.69.198.123 (talk) 23:25, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]