This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
The Statute is best known because of its constitutional significance in terms of the shift away from feudalism.
In hard sciences, one says things like "express the gravitational force between two bodies in terms of their masses and distance"; I haven't found any other context in which in terms of has a well-defined meaning, but I hear people saying it all the time because they're in too much of a rush to think of a more meaningful preposition.
Would the sense of the quoted sentence be damaged by removing terms of, i.e., by making it ...constitutional significance in the shift...? Or it could be rewritten: The Statute is a prominent marker in the constitutional shift away from feudalism. —Tamfang (talk) 05:35, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
