Talk:TensorFlow

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software / CompSci / Free and open-source software Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as High-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as High-importance).

This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as High-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Google High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

Artificial Intelligence

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 3 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ElliottKau, Arman Roshannai, MLu2022.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Storyline is incredibly confusing

Please, consider rewriting the article because the story doesn't follow a chronological order. Events happen at random years, THIS MAKES the reading VERY HARD TO FOLLOW. (ie. tensorflow started in 2015, then in 2011 its predecessor came up, then in 2017, a second version was launched, then in 2011 another thing happend, then in 2009 another one, OMG, PLEASE: FIX THIS ORDER. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drout 0 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Page Comments

DeepDream runs on DistBelief, not TensorFlow

Chronology of DistBelief paragraph: Does Dr. Hinton's work predate the work on DistBelief? If so the chronology of this paragraph could be improved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterRombouts (talk • contribs) 10:19, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Version 1.12.0 is out.Bojan PLOJ (talk) 11:06, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of negative information

Looking over the article, it seems that, while not blatantly promotional, the article is a little slanted in terms of POV. There seems to be almost no mention of any drawbacks, or any negative information whatsoever. Jeb³ _{Talk at me here}^{What I've Done} 18:24, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are asking a research-level question; it might as well be a critique of the work of Geoffrey Hinton. Perhaps you might start there. Otherwise, it appears that you asking for a synthesis of critiques which is not allowed, as OR for the article. --Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 20:28, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are you claiming TensorFlow has no drawbacks, deficiencies, or problems of any kind? If there are some, then they should be put into the article, or it should state that TensorFlow is perfect and flawless. 2600:8800:7000:33:0:0:0:4F5 (talk) 02:47, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jebcubed: Which negative information does this article omit, specifically? Which drawbacks should the article describe? Jarble (talk) 04:34, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article is perfectly okay for me. Pretty normal stuff. Not every Wikipedia article requires a criticism section. I also don't see any criticism in PyTorch or Caffe article. To me it requires noticeable negative aspects. Just do NOT go tagging articles before you at least comment (decently) on why you think it is biased. 138.118.198.37 (talk) 02:45, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine to me. I can't really agree with the "slanted POV" statement. It's not a big article really. peterl (talk) 07:41, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the tag. If an there are drawbacks or critiques to the technology that belong here, add them with a cite of a reliable source or at least post the reliable source here. WP:V If the wording reads like an advertisement, change the wording or at least make specific recommendations here. Barte (talk) 13:35, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism Survey 10-Dec-2020

Mayo, Matthew (November 2015). "TensorFlow Disappoints – Google Deep Learning falls shallow". KDnuggets. Retrieved 2020-12-10.
Kuster, Daniel (May 2016). "The Good, Bad & Ugly of TensorFlow". KDnuggets. Retrieved 2020-12-10.
Jimenez, Nico (2017-10-08). "Tensorflow sucks". Nico's blog. Retrieved 2020-12-10.
He, Horace (2019-10-10). "The State of Machine Learning Frameworks in 2019". The Gradient. Retrieved 2020-12-10.

Conrad T. Pino (talk) 18:36, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proprietary? Nah

To do so, the framework must keep track of the order of operations done to the input Tensors in a model…

I'm not a mathematician (although I do occasionally don chalk-smudged, suede-elbowed corduroy sport coats to make myself seem smarter), but as far as I know, Google hasn't actually trademarked the term "tensor"; thus it needn't be capitalized (which I believe is done to indicate that a formerly public concept is being "capitalized" upon). – AndyFielding (talk) 19:59, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]