Talk:Tennessee Lady Volunteers basketball/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

To uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of February 23, 2010, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I repaired one and tagged nine dead links using WP:CHECKLINKS

   ref #8 [1], geocities is not a WP:RS, likewise 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20, 22, 23 likewise 17, 18, 24, 26, 30, 31 [2], freeshell.org is not RS, 32

   There are a large number of un-cited statements throughout.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   OK, I am going to de-list this now as the referencing is so poor. Please sort this out and bring back to WP:GAN when fixed. Major contributors and projects will be notified. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:43, 23 February 2010 (UTC)