Talk:Tenali Ramakrishna (film)

Tenali Ramakrishna (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 13, 2019	Good article nominee	Listed

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Andhra Pradesh / Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 10 April 2019.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tenali Ramakrishna (film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:14, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Give me a week or two, thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:14, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Blofeld, you've been given more than a month. You still up to this? --Kailash29792 (talk) 09:41, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'd completely forgotten Kailash29792 Promise I'll look at it on the weekend.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:50, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, tomorrow morning for sure now!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:11, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cast and crew

"Initially disinterested, Bhanumathi accepted the offer because of Ranga's association as a cinematographer for films produced by her production company Bharani Pictures." -not sure why that would a reason? I've tweaked it a bit, looks good!

Sources didn't mention anything substantial about her actual disappointment, doc. May be she took up this role as an obligation or as a friendly gesture?

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail: A sound article.

Thanks for conducting the review Dr. Blofeld. A special note of thanks to Kailash29792 for extending his help at crucial junctures. Veera Narayana 05:33, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Tenali Ramakrishna (1956).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:07, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]