Jump to content

Talk:Tempo (comics)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Acolytes

[edit]

I removed the inclusion in the infobox as the reference in the article is stated as:

"She is slated to appear in the upcoming X-Men Annual forming part of the new team of Acolytes alongside other villains such as Exodus, Frenzy, and Random."

Since that is a detail of an yet to be published story it should be treated as suspect. See here in the Project guidelines for why.

If the issue has been published, please up date the article as well as the infobox. In such a case, the Acolytes article would also need to be updated.

Thanks for listening... — J Greb 01:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I vaguely remember Tempo as being a product of some "send your mutant in to Marvel" contest, where the powers were the same but they changed her to a black woman from a man. anyone? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.80.213.66 (talk) 08:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I remember this as well.

Also, I thought the hint was NOT that the Doctor was her father (in X-Factor), but rather that she had used that Doctor before to test her baby (or wanted to use that doctor in the future maybe). Thereby showing that she was a self-loathing mutant (self-hating is too strong). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.80.213.66 (talk) 08:33, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Powers

[edit]

Has it ever been made clear in canon if she actually manipulates time, or merely the perception of time? Noclevername 01:11, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sources

[edit]

I just flagged this article. It is in dire need of sources. --Guerillero (talk) 22:15, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

citations

[edit]

Removed numerous unnecessary citations. The main reference improvement tag at the beginning of the article suffices.Onel5969 (talk) 02:21, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, CN tags tell an editor that a fact is likely to be challenged and therefore needs a citation. The tag on the top does not do that --Guerillero | My Talk 02:33, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, yes. While a CN tag does exactly what you say it does, when a section, or entire article (as in this case), either is under-referenced or has no references, a tag at the beginning of the article or section in question suffices. That's the purpose of those article and section tags, to get the same point across, without cluttering the body of the article.Onel5969 (talk) 14:33, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]