Jump to content

Talk:Templeogue

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Blue Haven

[edit]

The Blue Haven is in Rathfarnham, over the bridge.

The Article

[edit]

This article really needs a full renovation. I recently completed a study of the area so I may begin to add sections of this onto the article in the near future Bella vista 21:29, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name of church

[edit]

It is pretty clear from the main reference given for the naming of the village (Tobar Moling and Templeogue: Myles V. Ronan, Dublin Historical Record, Vol. 5, No. 2 (Dec., 1942 - Feb., 1943), pp. 73-74 that they church is named after Mel not by him. Mel refers to a contemporary of St Patrick and not a 13th Century saint. DublinSoil (talk) 19:45, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Templeogue. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:07, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ali O Pablo

[edit]

Ali O Pablo is a local rapper and musician. He is a real person. Has anyone else came to his local shows? 123WasTaken (talk) 15:57, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Most "real people" enjoy singing but do not appear in an encyclopaedia unless they have achieved notability. I found no publicity for Mister Pablo. Spideog (talk) 06:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
have you not seen him near the village? 123WasTaken (talk) 20:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Irish name?

[edit]

Hi. Is there a particular reason why (as of March 2025) the:

  • Opening sentence doesn't follow the WP:IMOS#Place names convention? And "relegates" the Irish name (and derivation) to a footnote? (Where, effectively, the lead of every other article on a place/town/village/city/suburb in Ireland is different from what we have here?)
  • "Etymology" section doesn't make any mention of the "official" Irish language name? Leaving (IMO) the reader with questions? (If, as per the current version of the article/section, Teampal Óg has historical standing and the "official" Teach Mealóg is a misnomer or whatever, then shouldn't that simply be stated? Instead of just ignored? The process of anglicisation has lead to similar (entirely normal/understandable) issues elsewhere. Including notably in Dingle. But covered in short notes in any number of other articles. Why are we just ignoring it here?)
  • Footnote attached to the opening sentence is not even supported by the references which sit alongside it? The South Dublin County Council source for example, ostensibly supporting the note that "Templeogue" derives from "Teampal Óg", would seem to DIRECTLY CONTRADICT this statement. And ONLY refers to the "Teach Mealóg" variant - and makes no mention of "Teampal Óg" whatever. Same goes for the Logainm entry. Which also makes no mention of "Teampal Óg".)

Before I attempt to address these issues perhaps someone can help me understand whether I've overlooked something? (I don't see any Talk page discussion about this, but perhaps there was a "sidebar" somewhere?)

@Spideog, the article appears to have reflected the logainm entry (and other sources) until just last year. Where you made some changes as recently as Jan 2024. Where the related edit summaries were simply described as "correction"s. Can you elaborate on that please?

Otherwise, in honesty, I'm inclined to try and reflect what the differing sources say (as we do in every other similar article and as covered in WP:CONFLICTINGSOURCES). Rather than just cherry-picking one source. And effectively ignoring (or contradicting) all others. Guliolopez (talk) 15:34, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]