Jump to content

Talk:Tell the Vision/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zmbro (talk · contribs) 12:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Like we agreed. – zmbro (talk) 12:37, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • No recording dates/ranges?
  • Does drill apply to both versions? Jw
  • Shouldn't all writers be linked the first time?
  • Shouldn't West just be labeled as "West" in producers?
  • A choir from what?

Background and development

[edit]
  • Looks good

Music and lyrics

[edit]
  • Same questions from above related to this section apply here
  • Rest looks good

Release and reception

[edit]
  • Any reviews for the Donda version?

Commercial performance

[edit]
  • Looks good

Credits and personnel

[edit]
  • Looks good

Charts

[edit]
  • Looks good

Notes and references

[edit]
  • I would add a source for the note just to be safe
  • Make sure instances of the album titles are italicized throughout
  • Rest looks good

Final thoughts

[edit]