Talk:Telephone numbers in Serbia
Appearance
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Edits by sockpuppet
[edit]As it is obvious that recent edits were made my sockpuppet, i would raise the question here is any user with real account should comment anything about it. --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 14:57, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
KOSOVO
[edit]Informations on Kosovo are wrong. See ITU bulletin Dec. 2016 [1] and EU Statement Dec. 2016 [2]
As long as there is not more reliable source proving me ITU or EU wrong, I`ll update this section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amanaparts (talk • contribs) 19:31, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
References
- What the heck is the problem here? First, you keep on inserting {{main|Kosovo}} and completely inappropriate {{main|Kosovo War}} in an article devoted to telephone numbers. Per wikipedia:Summary style, the main article where this should be debated is Telephone numbers in Kosovo, and only summarized here very briefly, rather than forked in its entirety. I don't think that having the entire history in this article is appropriate. As for having the Albanian town names here as well, I can accept that, but we're edit-warring in an all-or nothing manner. No such user (talk) 09:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- We should not have both Albanian and Serbian, but only article names, as par guideline. No need for something like that in article about telephone, for Christ sake! --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 13:22, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Anastan:@No such user: Actually the guideline do not exclude having both names. See cities in switzerland. The point is that the cities have both names and for the sake of accuracy it should be stated like this. As for the history: OK, I made a mistake. However, the summary is wrong and does not include ITU bulletin statement or EU statement. Its just made up based on one sided sources. See ITU bulletin Dec. 2016 [1] and EU Statement Dec. 2016 [2]
- We should not have both Albanian and Serbian, but only article names, as par guideline. No need for something like that in article about telephone, for Christ sake! --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 13:22, 22 December 2016 (UTC)