Talk:Ted Olson (baseball)

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Baseball: Red Sox Low‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Boston Red Sox.

Untitled

Why does "Ted Olson" direct here instead of the solicitor general? This guy pitched a whole 18 games? Who cares? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.183.171.30 (talk) 17:57, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved by DrKiernan. --BDD (talk) 21:11, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ted Olson → Ted Olson (baseball) – I have no doubt that Theodore Olsen is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the name "Ted Olson." Compare his 11,421 views last month to the baseball player's 677 (and how many of those people typed in "Ted Olson" expecting the attorney?). What I'm not sure of is whether Theodore Olsen should remain at that title, with Ted Olson redirecting there, or if he should be moved there altogether. The Ted form is more prevalent, but Theodore is also frequently used (for comparison: "ted olson" -wikipedia "theodore olson" -wikipedia; note that for the former, you have to get more than halfway down the second page before the baseball player is mentioned). I'm sure there are precedents for this sort of situation, but I can't think of any. Feel free to oppose, of course, but if you support my basic idea, please indicate whether you'd prefer Ted Olson to redirect to the attorney or to be the article title. --BDD (talk) 00:55, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Ted Olson → Ted Olson (baseball) and redirect Ted Olson to Theodore Olson with a hatnote to Ted Olson (baseball). The lawyer is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for both Ted and Theodore, web search for Ted Olson shows [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] seven first-page listings for the lawyer, the first I could see for the baseball player is on the third page. Zarcadia (talk) 17:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support this one seems obvious. Hot Stop (Talk) 04:27, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per the above evidence. The lawyer is the primary, while this baseball player had but a brief and unremarkable career (from MLB standards). After this is done, a move discussion on the lawyers page could decide whether to stick with "Theodore" or move to "Ted" over the redirect. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:00, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per all above. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:13, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.