Talk:Team

Business Top‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cooperatives (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles

Mindys12345

Your reversion caught me in the middle of changes that I think would have improved the page. This page is disorganized and needs some simple work, like putting all the sentences about each sub-topic together instead of having them scattered around.

Is there any particular reason you're opposed to that? Or to having the sources properly linked instead of saying "(Reference: http://www.leader-values.com/Content/detail.asp?ContentDetailID=1004)"? I'm assuming that you actually looked at all of the changes you reverted before you did so... WhatamIdoing 05:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's

Here's a possible origin for the word "team". I'm not sure if it's the right origin but "team" can be an abreviation for "Together Everyone Achieves More". I saw it on a poster in one of my high school classrooms. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.66.172 (talk) 20:33, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology

Does TEAM really come from "Together Each Achieves More" (as in synergy)? I heard this is what it means. If it's true maybe it should be one of the first lines of the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.97.200.25 (talk) 19:57, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No. It's just an advertising slogan. WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:58, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]