Talk:Te Conozco Bien

Te Conozco Bien has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 22, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed

Latin music: Tropical music Low‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Tropical music task force.

Puerto Rico Low‑importance

	Puerto Rico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Te Conozco Bien/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I'm going to be reviewing this article next and it is not me cherry picking your nominations, rather than generally reviewing smaller articles due to time constraints with my job. --K. Peake 07:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Shouldn't New York in the infobox's studio parameter be NY instead per the source and the fact you have already written New York City, so it becomes clear what state is being abbreviated?
"by Omar Alfanno with productions handled" → "by Omar Alfanno, with production being handled"
I don't think the word "lead" is appropriate for a promo single, so change to first and wikilink promotional single per MOS:LINK2SECT
"It is a salsa song in which the artist is certain his lover" → "A salsa song, it sees the singer express certainty that someone" per the body's wording not specifying a lover
"The song won the Billboard Latin Music Award for" → "The song was awarded" plus mention it being at the 1996 Billboard Latin Music Awards after the field
"for the Lo Nuestro Award for Tropical Song of the Year" → "for the Tropical Song of the Year award"
Mention in prose that it was the Premio Lo Nuestro in the same year
"on the studio album" → "on his studio album"
Remove the arranged and produced info, as that is not notable for the lead

Background and composition

"his second studio" → "his second studio album"
"record which was" → "record, which was"
Specify whether the 200,000 copies were sold worldwide or in the United States, if this is known
Mention that the album earned him the award at the 1994 ceremony
"titled Todo a Su Tiempo (1995) which" → "entitled Todo a Su Tiempo, which" because the release year is evident from you mentioning it being two years later
"produced alongside Marc Anthony." → "produced alongside Anthony." since even though it is not his real name, you don't need to use it in full on two instances within the same sentence
"Omar Alfanno including" → "Omar Alfanno, including"
[6] should be solely at the end of the sentence and swapped with [7], as the latter is about Alfanno's penning
Pipe chorus to Refrain
Full-stop inside the brackets is useless, plus if the source mentions the chorus being in reference to anyone specifically then include that
Change lead to first per my earlier comment and the source
Wikilink promotional single per MOS:LINK2SECT, plus move this sentence to the below section as I will further instruct

Reception

Retitle to Promotion and reception, swapping the paragraphs and making the promo single info the first sentence of the new opener
Add a comma before while plus remove Peruvian newspaper introduction to La Prensa
"called one of the artist's" → "called it one of Marc Anthony's"
"was also nominated in" → "was nominated in"
"but lost to" → "ultimately losing to"
Either change the US to the United States here per MOS:US, or keep as it is if the full name is used in the previous section
"reached the top" → "reached the top position" to avoid confusion
"was added to his" → "was added to Marc Anthony's" but the version is not directly sourced as being truncated
- See the track duration of the song on the original album and the greatest hits. I have both discs as well incase there's another need to verify.
Wikilink greatest hits album instead
Add a comma after (1999)
"of the song during 2000 in at" → "of the song in 2000 at"
The album being produced by Alfanno is not sourced

Charts

Good

References

Copyvio score looks incredible at 2.9%!!!!
Remove AllMusic from the title of ref 1
Pipe Billboard to Billboard (magazine) and Nielsen Business Media to Nielsen Holdings on ref 4
elsalvador.com → El Salvador on ref 7, citing as work/website instead
Fix MOS:CAPS issues with ref 11
Cite PR Newswire as publisher instead for ref 13, replacing the other one
Cite Unvision as publisher instead for ref 14, replacing the other one
Allmusic → AllMusic on ref 19
Cite AllMusic as publisher for ref 20
Remove publisher from ref 21
Remove Billboard from ref 24 and wikilink Reuters

Final comments and verdict

On hold until all of the issues are fixed, though this did seem a bit disorganized in parts compared to your previous GANs! --K. Peake 11:07, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the disorganization, the article was actually harder than it seems because finding sources for this song was pretty difficult. I almost gave up on this article, but I really love this song as it's one of my childhood songs. Tropical/salsa don't really get the attention that Latin pop recordings do.

As for the shortened version of the song, I'm citing the song's duration which is shorter than the duration on the original album, plus I have both albums so I can verify it offline. Sales didn't mentioned US or worldwide. Erick (talk) 01:12, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Magiciandude It is fine since disorganization is something that can be fixed in reviews and I can fully relate to struggling with the expansion of favourite songs, but you still need to fix the reception section. --K. Peake 07:33, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it was late at night, so I overlooked it. How does it look now? Erick (talk) 18:57, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Magiciandude ✓ Pass now, I moved the commercial info to the end of the section but elsewise you did everything right! --K. Peake 19:37, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]