Talk:Tayong Dalawa

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tayong Dalawa article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Tayong Dalawa. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Tayong Dalawa at the Reference desk.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Plot and Synopsis

The Synopsis and Plot sections were deleted since the lead paragraph of the article already contains this information. In keeping with the encyclopedic nature of Wikipedia, I suggest that we only add these sections only when the episodes shown warrants a discussion that transcends the plot lines illustrated in the teaser. -Iamasmartaleck (talk) 10:16, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just asking, why do we need separate "Plot" and "Synopsis" sections? Aren't they just the same? --kazu (talk) 14:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to point out something. I don't see any relationship with the story in the plot and the list of episodes don't match. I'm currently following the episodes on Channel 5 and i feel it is going the way "the details of episode" though it is vague and very less detailed. Thanks *Thakkudu :) 10:04, 4 November 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thakkudus (talk • contribs)

Broadcasts on 720p???

Produced or encoded on 720p, it's like digital to analog, Can somebody confirm this? Kamuixtv (talk) 04:08, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deceased characters

~~If you're gonna put a (deceased) tag on any of the characters, we'll put a deceased tag on all deceased characters, and this includes Jake's character Dave.~~ And do not remove deceased characters from the list. kazu (talk) 14:40, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~Jake is considered dead, they even discussed it on SNN. For now let's just place it for consistency.~~ kazu (talk) 14:45, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree kazu but the thing that bothers me is there are some unregistered users who kept on vandalizing the cast section... and it drives me nuts!!

-TrueLicense909 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:54, 19 March 2009 (UTC).[reply]

I've thought it through but personally I like it without all the 'deceased' eyesore. Also Dave will come back. kazu (talk) 11:06, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fan-like?

Why remove the Trivia, the character description and everything???

If you really care about fan-like creations, why not go to the GME Kanguso pages?

Joaquin Bordado, Codename: Asero, Luna Mystika, Darna, Bakekang

If nothing changes in those pages, you've only proven yourselves as stupid kanguso intruder pricks whose trying to ruin the Kapamilya pages! -- User:KapamilyaForever! 14:45, 22 March 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.72.213.195 (talk) [reply]

Please note that this is NOT a forum for the subject, and that we DO NOT tolerate any arguments or conflicts regarding the article. The reason for the removals is because of Wikipedia's policy when it comes to trivia and unnecessary info; if you find this policy difficult to get used to, I suggest that you either read the rules, or quit editing if you don't have something nice to say. Blake Gripling (talk) 03:15, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Let me add to that. If you can get away with your network-war BS on Philippine Entertainment Portal or PinoyExchange, please, spare Wikipedia your fanboy diatribes...walang lugar yan dito (they have no place here), man.--Eaglestorm (talk) 03:46, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can always merge trivia with other appropriate sections. Just make it encyclopedic and NOT fanboyish like "Gerard loved Kim so much since they are meant for each other *squee* *squee* *squee*". –Howard the Duck 03:56, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I'm playing devil's advocate... but what's wrong with allowing character descriptions for the main cast? At least for the big three (Kim, Gerald, Jake). Surely they can reference enough material about them? --Aeon17x (talk) 04:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes they should probably have descriptions. Even unsourced can be accepted as long as didn't sound like someone was squeeing when it was being typed. –Howard the Duck 04:20, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blake removed the stuff before because it was too crufty and like I said in the tambayan IIRC, like a suspense-novel's jacket description. --Eaglestorm (talk) 20:07, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Come to think of it, I have YET to see a decent TV show article from ABS-CBN. I'm just saying. Starczamora (talk) 20:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Asus, kapuso ka lang eh. --79.78.48.127 (talk) 18:28, 18 September 2009 (UTC) Translation: Yeah right, you're obviously just one of those "kapusos." [connotation for fans of GMA-7])[reply]

And I'm also yet to see a decent GMA article, just to be even. Blake Gripling (talk) 23:07, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ratings

Hi! I once posted the ratings. I don't know why it was deleted even if I indicated proper sources. And I did not expound by words anymore. I only indicated figures. --Huwatttt (talk) 07:34, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Character Profiles

whoever deleted the first character profile i did apparently doesn't want this article improved. if the question is about apparent fabrication, i used the episodes as a referenbce. i am currentlly looking for a good episode summary list to further reference my work. as the Duck said before, unreferenced character profiles can be done as long as they don't like squeeing. that's the second point. maybe the one who deleted the profile mistook my work as the same as that of the JR profile. that one is indeed squeeing, he did nothing but simply put in and repeat the character roles, and in bad grammar too.

as i see it this series deserves a good page since it has an outstanding storyline. for those who want to write character profiles, don't simply reiterate the roles but expound on them. the series already has a great deal of material presented on the characters, so use it. ideal a character profile should contain a plot for that character plus how he or she is presented on the show.

as for the ratings, forget about posting that. we're here to provide information on the show and not promote it. let's not do the way some GMA shows' articles are written, which emphasizes ratings too much to the point that they look like PR work. besides it's really irrelevent.

i'll be adding the audrey king profile later.Flamerounin (talk) 11:49, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cameo at the End???

Can we put in the Cameos section Rosanna Roces and Enchong Dee? They did appear in the last episode as another part of David Garcia Sr.'s family (Rosanna as David Sr.'s former wife and Enchong as another David Garcia...) Heran et Sang'gres (talk) 02:24, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox pic caption

An anon user has been changing the caption in the infobox with a show slogan when such material is not appropriate. To those who insist, I suggest you read up on what should and should not be on infoboxes...and seriously, slapping sock tags on editors who could no longer assume your good faith because you continue with your shenanigans don't help. Thank you. --Eaglestorm (talk) 14:06, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Book 2

Some recent edits have information alluding to a so-called Tayong Dalawa: Book 2. I think we should keep our keystrokes off posting such info until ABS-CBN confirms that a sequel will be made. I've been to the TD forum on PinoyExchange, and it seems that Book 2 is just fans' imagination...what, just because somebody else appeared in the ending? --Eaglestorm (talk) 08:56, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add to this: all edits regarding the so-called "Book 2" should be accompanied by reliable and verifiable sources. (If the source comes from an official announcement by ABS-CBN, maybe on its official website, it may be considered. Just that it shouldn't be on ABS's own message boards.)

Postings from message boards, blogs, social networking sites or any other similar websites will not be considered, in accordance with Wikipedia policies. Sources from PinoyExchange or Multiply.com are not considered good sources and cannot be used as reference.

Any such unreliable edits will be removed on sight, with or without explanation. Thanks for understanding. --- Tito Pao (talk) 09:08, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Kim Chiu 06-19-16.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:52, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]