Talk:Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion Law

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation

Tambayan Philippines Mid‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 11 October 2018 by reviewer Legacypac (talk · contribs).

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge of Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion Act with Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion Law

Same subject, two articles Howard the Duck (talk) 19:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support. No one ever noticed this? —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 11:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Howard the Duck: I guess we'll have to do this by ourselves. I don't think anyone would say anything anytime soon. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 13:43, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is gonna be a pain in the ass. These articles are way too long. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 13:46, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This merger was done incorrectly; it should've been done the other way as the TRAIN Act article is older than the TRAIN Law article. Will be fixing the merger so that the older article's history is preserved. --Sky Harbor ^(talk) 04:42, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]