Talk:Tawuia

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tree of Life Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tree of Life, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of taxonomy and the phylogenetic tree of life on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tree of LifeWikipedia:WikiProject Tree of LifeTemplate:WikiProject Tree of Lifetaxonomic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wang et al. (2011) described the cell walls of Chuaria and show that it is most likely a multicellular eukaryotic alga. They note on page 1257, "The formation yields abundant leiospheroid acritarchs and macroscopic carbonaceous compression fossils such as Chuaria, Tawuia, Ellipsophysa, and Sinosabellidites", implying that Tawuia is valid.

Wang X, Yuan X L, Zhou C M, et al. Anatomy and plant affinity of Chuaria. Chinese Sci Bull, 2011, 56: 1256−126 http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs11434-011-4370-x.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.111.125.161 (talk) 13:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rule of priority

Tawuia was named in 1979 and Chuaria was named in 1899, so if they are synonyms, Chuaria by far has priority. J. Spencer (talk) 02:44, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chuaria (and also Longfengshania) are valid as separate form-genera so not strictly synonyms, even though they may represent different parts of the same plant according to some authors. Thus they deserve their own articles (presently just redirects to this one) which I may or may not get around to at some point... Tony 1212 (talk) 19:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]