Jump to content

Talk:Tata Indica

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Removed Review section for NPOV

  • Removed some strange text toward the bottom of the page, can only assume it was another langauge: please remember, Wikipedia is English. Also removed NPOV section "Praise" and tidied up the text somewhat to give a more objective feel to it.

Bought my TATA INDICA only to have problems from the beginning,There was rust on my car 2days afer i bougth it, my gears gave me problems and still do, after 10 000km my cars breaks started giving problems, I told the dealership and they said i must wait for my first service to get it fix. My car has paint on the windows,and I ask them why, they told me its massive production. After they fix my breaks i needed to balance my wheels, just to find out yhat my new car rear axle a bented, im traying to get it fix for more then a year now but nothing.

As a tata vehicle owner, I'd suggest you try contacting customercare@tatamotors.com or the concerned regional office from http://www.customercare.tatamotors.com/contact/reachUs.asp . they usually respond —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.4.175 (talk) 04:08, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Two reverse lights only one bulb

[edit]

I have noticed that most of the Indicas' here in Mangalore have only one reverse bulb installed in the two reverse light holders. The dealer here mentioned that it comes only with one bulb.--PremKudvaTalk 05:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

indian car,indian article

[edit]

this article is soooo indian... the englsh especially.

I seem to recall in the wikipedia guidelines that if an article is principally about something in a country, that country's version of English is appropriate to use. Sblument (talk) 22:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Split Tata Indica Vista?

[edit]

Sounds like the Indica Vista is a significant model change. Should it get its own article? --IanOsgood (talk) 20:30, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The Indica vista is considered the second generation of the Indica ( sample usage http://www.tata.com/media/articles/inside.aspx?artid=+Q/G6pe666o= )While it is claimed to be all new,and the name is being gradually transitioned to Vista, it is still the second generation of the car.

Additionally, regarding splitting the EV articles, EV versions of both the first and second generation Indicas have been launched, and (on a personal note, there have been several design studies and variants on the indica platform, the indica page itself is proof - apart from the four sedan platforms and stationwagon launched commercially, there have also been several sport/rally/off road variants ( and now EV) variants, none of which have actually been produced commercially. Unless a product is launched and available in the market , I suggest that they remain in the main page. Kickassso (talk) 20:49, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

[edit]

The whole article reads as if it was written by somebody in Tata's PR department. While it's understandable that Indians should take pride in their indigenous car industry and its products, a bit more balance is needed. For a different perspective on this car see Rover CityRover. --Ef80 (talk) 16:26, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements

[edit]

After looking at the Indigo article and discovering it was an obvious advertisement, I decided to go through some other Tata car articles to see how they are. I was glad to see that this one is better, but it has a lot of unnecessary info, most of which is advertisement-like. There is no need to list all of the optional features of a car (or any, for that matter, unless they are somehow unique). If bloat is cut down and maybe some more content is added, this could be a GA. 99.135.175.17 (talk) 00:52, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tata Indica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:39, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Tata Indica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Tata Indica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tata_Indica&oldid=1210147782"