Talk:TaskForceMajella
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Ref formatting
[edit]You currently have two incompatible citations styles in this article. You need to pick either WP:PARENthetical citations or <ref> tags, and make all citations use that style. If you can't decide, then the usual rule is to use whichever style was used in the article first (probably WP:PAREN). WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:08, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Conflict of Interest
[edit]According to Xtools, 86% of this article was written by Jpvandijk, who may have a close association with the subject of the article.
- Is the topic of the article (the research task force itself) notable? I cannot find sources independent of the task force that describe it. But they may be written in Italian.
- I'm concerned that this article may be self-promotional, hence may not be written from a neutral point of view. There is nothing blatantly tendentious that I can see, however.
Any comments from experts in fracturing, faults, or petroleum geology would be very helpful. — hike395 (talk) 18:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- He openly states on his talk page that:
- "He was for six years Team Leader and Project Manager of the ENI research program on Fractured Prospects and Reservoirs, and the TaskForceMajella Project (TFM)"
- This is clearly a Conflict of Interest and self-promotion because he is using Wikipedia to promote his own research. Paul H. (talk) 19:01, 30 January 2025 (UTC)