Talk:Tashkent Rebellion (1917)

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Central Asia: Uzbekistan

	Asia portal Tashkent Rebellion (1917) is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Uzbekistan portal This article is supported by WikiProject Uzbekistan.

More inline citations?

Every paragraph is cited here, so I'm not seeing the problem, Scope creep. If you're suggesting I use shortened footnotes instead, the main source used is only nine pages total, so it seems unneeded. An anonymous username, not my real name 11:36, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @An anonymous username, not my real name:, that is a really cool account name. No, not shortened refs. You have one reference covering the prelude and rebellion section, which is insufficient in anybodys book. Generally you have a lot of very specific reference running into dozens per article, generally one for each sentence, or logical connected block. I'm not seeing that here. Its great, well-written article and I would be proud to write it, but I think the reader, as a historical rebelllion article, would expect to see whole lists of books on historical aspects, sections on the battle in further reading or a bibliography section as well as being used as references. I don't how many references, but I would expect to see dozens in a similar historial battle or rebellion article. Its worth a thought, hopefully. scope_creep^Talk 13:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind words and encouragement; just to be clear, you're suggesting I use more sources overall? An anonymous username, not my real name 15:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Yes, if you can. scope_creep^Talk 18:51, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep:, I took another look, but the only source covering the detail of the events that I can find online with Google Scholar is the one I already used. I noticed what may have been another by searching th Wikipedia library, but it is not accessible for whatever reason. What should I do in that case? In absence of a valid alternative, I don't think this article needs to be tagged, but correct me if I'm mistaken. An anonymous username, not my real name 00:49, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]