Talk:Tashkent Declaration

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on January 10, 2018 and January 10, 2021.

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 20:02, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

pakistani peoples point of view not mentioned

the tashkent agreement resulted in president ayub khans fall because people of pakistan viewed it as a sell out as pakistan had captured more indian terrirtories as compared to india, and these lands were returned by president ayub khan by keeping a leinient stance towards india, this shud hav been mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.153.94.28 (talk) 07:27, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the fact that 'The power of Ayub Khan Subsided after the pact' this has also been verified by a neutral source HISTORICAL OVERVIEW of Pakistan by US Dept. of State ( http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3453.htm#history) . But i dont agree with statement that "Pakistan conquered more land" this was a propaganda spread by the Pakistan army to hide their losses in the 1965 war. Please refer the full article Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1965for more details and a neutral perspective. --dBigXray (talk) 22:06, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Consequences of the Tashkent Declaration

The power of Ayub Khan declined after Pakistan lost the 1965 war. this can even be verified from a neutral Source Pakistan:HISTORICAL OVERVIEW US Dept. of State http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3453.htm#history . Besides the consequences and aftermath of this declaration are important to be discussed in short. Please do not remove this subsection. --dBigXray (talk) 22:03, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

State department is not a neutral source, Its a department of the US government. This same state department also said "Iraq had weapons of mass destruction". The end result of the war was a stalemate but one that Pakistan won because it was a much smaller state and it defended it territory after it was invaded on sept 6 1965.

Also removed the 1971 war, Its irrelevant to the Tashkent declaration unless you want to mention that India violated the Tashkent declaration by arming and funding and wet nursing the Mukhti Bahini. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.52.141.95 (talk) 17:13, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Gen Musa Khan in 1965.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:52, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Armed forces flag.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:59, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]