This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology articles
Please review Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines and note the following guideline: "Do not use the talk page as a forum or soapbox for discussing the topic. The talk page is for discussing improving the article."
Islamic scholars claim that taqiyya is only permissible under duress, and that the inflationary use of the term qualifies as "a staple of right-wing Islamophobia in North America" (Mohammad Fadel 2013), or "Taqiyya libel against Muslims"[16] while their critics accuse them of practicing "taqiyya about taqiyya" (Raymond Ibrahim, 2014).
Koreangauteng, I am not going to reply there for that polemic post. I find it inappropriate that you are referencing my religion and my native language and my country and that I love prophet Muhammad peace be upon him as a reason for conflict of interest, these things are none of your business. You ignore the real argument. You are adding unreliable non-expert sources. Like sources from self-publishing companies or Christian apologist source from a non-acadamic publisher, and who is not an expert in Islam. Or using primary sources etc. File:Wikipedia scale of justice3.jpgYou seem to be trying to create WP:FALSEBALANCE.--SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 05:07, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I dont know if I should continue replying to your polemic post but the fact that I am a Muslim makes it more reasonable and essential to edit in that area and to fight Islamophobia propaganda. For example, see my work in multi-million dollars-funded Islamophobic organizations such as Jihad Watch or Gatestone Institute. I, because I am a Muslim, should work these articles and expose their anti-Muslim bias. And imagine that, these organizations get paid millions of dollars to spread anti-Muslim propaganda and yet I along with other editors come and expose them in Wikipedia, one of the most visited websites on the internet, and I get my Wifi connection from my neighbors and eat popcorns for the whole day. Do you see how essential is my presence in these articles?--SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 05:30, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This is far from my area of expertise, but I was recently reading about pikuach nefesh, and learned that "darura" is the comparable principle in Islam. Of which taqiyya is said to be an example. Should this be mentioned in the page? Bueller 007 (talk) 16:49, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
