Talk:Tanum Tunnel/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Albacore (talk · contribs) 19:37, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- Not convinced that tunnel has to be linked in the lead, as it's a common term
- I wouldn't link this in regular prose, but I feel that as this is an article about a tunnel, there is a significantly above-average chance that a reader might want go to the tunnel article. Arsenikk (talk) 11:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- The tunnel runs mostly through Cambrian-Silurian sedimentary slate no need to link sedimentary
- The line was built to allow increased the railway traffic though the west corridor. Reads awkwardly; a re-write would be nice.
- The Norwegian National Rail Administration awarded the contract to build delink Norwegian National Rail Administration
- Perhaps link low-frequency sound to Infrasound
- Thanks for pointing out the correct term. Arsenikk (talk) 11:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- Therefore, one of the main focuses in the Skaugum Tunnel project was to avoid similar leaks, and the criteria were set to 4 liters (0.88 imp gal; 1.1 US gal) per minute per 100 meters (330 ft). This was achieved by using sufficient time for the pre-injection. Don't understand what is meant by "the criteria were set to 4 liters (0.88 imp gal; 1.1 US gal) per minute per 100 meters (330 ft)", and I don't understand the second sentence.
- Rephrased. Arsenikk (talk) 11:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- other places water ripped onto electrical equipment. dripped?
- with water running down the walls and collecting in the cable conduit perhaps link "conduit"
I'm putting the article on hold. Best, Albacore (talk) 19:37, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to review the article, you comments are most appreciated. Arsenikk (talk) 11:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- Re-read, and everything looks good. Pass. Albacore (talk) 19:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC)