Talk:Tana Municipality

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Move

I intend to move the article back to it's original name, instead of the official name, as per the Wikipedia official policy on naming conventions. The move to the official name was not discussed here first, and here is my rationale for moving it back:

WP:NAME states that an article should have the name that is most common in use
- The municipality is in Norway, therefore its Norwegian name is obviously the most common name in everyday use
- In official signage kommune, gielda/suohkan etc is included
The Norwegian and Sami language wikis have their articles named in those languages respectively, not both
Similar examples of this are en:Helsinki/fi:Helsinki/sv:Helsingfors and en:Cardiff/cy:Caerdydd

As the municipality has a significant amount of Sami speakers, I can understand it if someone feels the article should be moved to the Sami name. However, for the reasons above, I think the correct place is under its Norwegian name. - BsL 00:03, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per argument in Talk:Porsanger. I suggest the discussion continues there.Labongo 09:30, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was moved to Tana, Norway –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:29, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deatnu - Tana → ~~Tana~~ Tana, Norway — Per the above, and to simplify, for the benefit of our users. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 23:08, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Tana, Norway. Tana is a disambiguation page, and I'm not convinced that this is the primary topic for that name. The current bilingual name is not a good solution at all in my opinion. Jafeluv (talk) 10:55, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 11:13, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tana, Norway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040614073527/http://eklima.met.no/ to http://eklima.met.no/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.fishtana.com/pages/page_14.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:27, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]