Talk:Tan line

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nudity Low‑importance

	Nudity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nudity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of nudity and naturism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NudityWikipedia:WikiProject NudityTemplate:WikiProject Nuditynudity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1 (2006–2012)

I do not like black porn

Sandal tan & Goggle tan photos?

If anyone can provide good, copyright-free photos illustrating Sandal tan & Goggle tan, it'd be great to add those to the article. (There are lots of good photos online, but generally protected by copyright.) —Patrug (talk) 11:35, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Patrug Before jumping into wiki-hound accusations, the reason why I reverted your edit was a coincidental reason of finding it unnecessary to link an article on Golf to a particular form of tan due to reason being somewhat unrelated other than the name, and even there I have my doubt. (N0n3up (talk) 00:52, 30 July 2016 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tan line. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1082764/3/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]