Jump to content

Talk:Tameside/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


Comments by Epicadam (talk · contribs):

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Minor issues, mentioned below
    B. MoS compliance:
    remember: pictures and tables should not be left-aligned under section headers
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    GA pass. Well done.


Minor changes that I would make:

  • "Since then the area has been administered by Tameside Borough Council, which has been judged by the Audit Commission to be "performing strongly"." Just remove this. It's unnecessary.
  • "an earthwork" What's an earthwork?

Other than that, great work. -epicAdam(talk) 02:39, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]