Talk:Talbot armoured car

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

First run

Thank you for this lovely article! As I am new to MilHist (though not WP), I don't know if there's a set structure to articles that you're following. That said, I tend to like starting with History/Background so a lay reader understands how the subject in question originated. Then a specs section. Then an operational history. Finally, a legacy and current status (existing museum pieces, derivatives, appearances in media, etc.)

I also can't check any of your sources, but I'm sure you've done the research, and the citations are in the right place.

So for now, a "C", and I look forward to chatting with you more!

@GraemeLeggett: --Neopeius (talk) 18:41, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]