Talk:Talang 2007/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

I am sorry that you have had to wait so long for a review, but as this nomination had not been listed at WP:GAN, no-one knew that you were seeking review. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:00, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
I made a number of copy-edits, also adding citation and other tags. [1]

Apart from that, the prose is "reasonably well written".

Article is sufficiently MoS compliant
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
I fixed three and tagged three dead links, using WP:CHECKLINKS.

There are some statements that I tagged as needing citations.

Those references that I could access were verifiable,reliable sources.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
The article covers the subject in reasonable depth and is focussed upon it.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
There are a few unsupported statements that I tagged as lacking a WP:NPOV.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

On hold for seven days, for above issues to be addressed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 01:04, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I note that the nominator is blocked indefinitely so I shall fail this nomination as they cannot address the issues raised. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 01:18, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]