Talk:Takeda

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 10:14, December 19, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Anthroponymy

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy

split-tagging

Why the split suggestion? It's not like it's huge or unreadable... Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 17:11, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because dab content and name content should not be mixed. Split has been done to defuse any confusion. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:36, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of referring to my request for an explanation as confusion on my part, why don't you show me where it says this must be done? Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 12:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

武田/竹田

The article lead-in only talks about 武田 and completely ignores 竹田. Obviously both, and possibly other, writings are possible, as the list of people of that name shows both the (presumably) prominent 武田 Takeda clan, as well as the (presumably) commoner 竹田 Takeda, plus a good many without kanji; this should at least be mentioned, and better yet, the various etymologies explained. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:A62:1A43:C901:3C46:85E9:60A8:B78A (talk) 08:59, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]