Talk:Taiwanese wave

This article was nominated for deletion on 17 August 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Taiwan Mid‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 04:02, December 20, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

East Asia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Taiwan F4's poster attached to Hoa Hoc Tro Magazine (Vietnam).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:06, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Images of Taiwanese idols, attached to Hoa Hoc Tro Magazine (Vietnam).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:07, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Images of Taiwanese idols, on cover page of Dat Mui Cuoi Tuan Magazine (Vietnam).jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:08, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

This article should be redirected to Cinema of Taiwan. It's literally the same topic, and the article right now is filled with unverified material and most likely written by someone who most likely weren't impartial when writing it. Should I even begin with the dubious Vietnamese sources? Like I can read Vietnamese, and if it was in English it would immediately fail as a reliable source. 202.143.110.37 (talk) 06:43, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This topic isnt covered at all at Cinema of Taiwan, its not even mentioned once. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 06:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A subsection can be added over this supposed "wave". I don't see how a standalone article merits any standing. It's hardly comparable to Korean wave, and the user who created this was like I said, impartial. The article creator's username is literally named "TaiwaneseWaveVN" for a start. The term "台流" doesn't even translate to Taiwanese wave. You can't force a cultural phenomenon that just isn't notable. 202.143.110.37 (talk) 06:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In order to merge it a section would need to already exist at the target. If no suitable redirect target exists and you feel it isn't notable then nominating it for deletion would be the preferred path. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 07:03, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is this even relevant anymore?

I think the lack of new sources can be taken a source that this is antiquated information, I mean 'soon' for something that came out almost 15 years ago. 158.140.180.89 (talk) 12:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]