Talk:Taissir Tamimi

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Notability?

I have never heard of this guy and can find hardly anything about him anywhere. Does he meet Wikipedia notability guidelines? Those who think so, please provide the evidence or argument here and improve the article's referencing. Tiamut 16:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lede

The 10-minute" papal controversy" does not belong in the lead; not really something Tamimi is notable for. If anything, his lengthy career in reforming Islamic law in the Palestinian territories should be mentioned. Also, why did you remove the fact that Tamimi was born in Hebron from the lead? I added the citation. --Al Ameer son (talk) 21:06, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The papal controversy is notable because it is the only way he is internationally known. He received international media coverage for his diatribe. Outside of that, people know little about him nor is it notable on a global scale. Regarding his being born in Hebron, it should be placed in a bio section, but not in the lead with a reference. References should be avoided in the lead.ShamWow (talk) 04:47, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

his place of birth is, of course, notable. and, "diatribe", is POV here, just as the formulation, it would be his "nationalist views" which bring him into conflict with israel. one could also say it's israels occupation policy in the west bank which "brings him into this conflict".--Severino (talk) 16:07, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It has been described as a "tirade" in various sources across the political spectrum [1], [2], [3]. We can use that term instead.ShamWow (talk) 16:40, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The lead is not exactly ideal and there's not enough info about his early life (in fact, no info except that he was born in Hebron and his father Rajab was detained by Israel in the late 1960s.) We don't have to use what the sources say, even if there news sources. Many news sources are reliable, but they could use words that are not NPOV per Wikipedia's guidelines such as "terrorist" or "extremist". The best word I could think of to use is "condemnation." As for having the info in the lead, it's good that it has been reduced, but it still looks more imposing than anything else so could someone add a bit about his long career in leading the Islamic court in the Palestinian territories for balance. --Al Ameer son (talk) 19:57, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Changed the term from tirade-->denunciation/condemnation. If you can find more info about his early life, that's great - it still doesn't need to be in the lead though but in a bio section. Lead functions as a summation of the article, with attention paid to more notable events. The lead can be expanded. Also, would you mind properly footnoting the refs you added.ShamWow (talk) 21:27, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for cooperating and remaining cordial throughout. I'll try to find more on his early life and emailed PASSIA to create a mini-biography on him on their website as they do with dozens of notable Palestinians. Hopefully, we'll get something of use. I'm not sure what's improper about the formatting. Do you mean we should use Harvnb style? --Al Ameer son (talk) 01:05, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glad we found accommodation. For how you're citing now, I would try this - WP:Citing_sources/Further_considerations#Wikilinks_to_full_references. Hope you find more info on the Sheikh.ShamWow (talk) 19:12, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Taissir Tamimi. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1251145126442

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Taissir Tamimi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224035938/http://www.imemc.org/article/50248 to http://www.imemc.org/article/50248
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1222017624601&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1242029499952&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.oecumene.radiovaticana.org/en1/Articolo.asp?c=286705

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:42, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]