Talk:Tails Adventure/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 10:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Shall review this article. MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Development and release
[edit]- The North American release date need to have its citation needed tag addressed in the prose and the infobox
Reception
[edit]- " Mean Machines Sega agreed, calling it "decidedly unoriginal" and," - From my perspective, it appears that there is something missing from this section of text. If so, please rectify it
- "1UP.com called Tails Adventures and Tails Skypatrol" - Adventure
References
[edit]- Perhaps you could consider archiving References 3 and 13 like you have done with the other online sources
Overall, a beautifully written article. Only a few minor nit picks prevent an automatic promotion to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 18:08, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- @MWright96: Thank you. I fixed all items. TarkusABtalk 12:28, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- @TarkusAB: Now promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 13:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)