Jump to content

Talk:Taihō Code

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

TAIHO CODE ROCKS —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.82.108.177 (talk) 19:40, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move to Taihō Code. —Nightstallion (?) 11:14, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Code of Taiho" or "Taiho Code"?

[edit]

I've always known it as the "Taiho Code", not the "Code of Taiho". A Google search using "Taiho Code" (with quotes for exact phrase search) turns up 517 results, while "Code of Taiho" turns up only 67 results, some of them Wikipedia-related. Also, "Code of Taiho" sounds awkward. I would like to propose having "Code of Taiho" redirect to "Taiho Code", rather than vice-versa.

Requested move

[edit]

Code of Taihō → Taihō Code – per: 1. Taihō Code used more often. 2. Code of Taihō sounds awkward.

Survey

[edit]
Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
  • Support. As the one who started this article and, I think, contributed the most, I am surprised to discover that all my books refer to either "Taiho Code" or "Taiho ritsuryo" and not The Code of Taiho. I wonder where I got that from. LordAmeth 10:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Results of Google Scholar and Google Books agree Taiho Code is more common. --Kusunose 10:37, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Here we go again - Korean influence on early Japan

[edit]

Yes, we Wikipedians are encouraged to be bold. But as this issue of Korean influence on early Japan has been a hot topic on a number of different pages recently, some of them exploding into full-on edit wars, I am hoping that we can discuss this here, and hopefully reach some sort of compromise. As for my opinion, I acknowledge the importance of Korean cultural and political influences on the Yamato state. And I think that some mention of this is interesting to include in the article, provided it is accurate and relevant, even if it is not 100% necessary to an understanding of the topic. LordAmeth 02:48, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

However, Korea is not related to the approval of TaihoCode. Japan valued obtaining information from China directly. --Orchis29 (talk) 17:46, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Exact year when the code was enacted

[edit]

What is the exact year when the code was enacted? This article says 703, but other articles (such as Taihō (era), Daijō-kan, Daijō-daijin, etc) say 702. --Miwako Sato (talk) 11:19, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]