Talk:Tai Lam Tunnel
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Move request
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was not moved. For now, this is the primary topic. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:58, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Both tunnels with this name are equally notable. The railway one is longer and carries more people everyday. Jeremy (talk) 11:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Suggest Tai Lam Tunnel (road). Peterkingiron (talk) 14:48, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. A cursory Google search shows the road tunnel is more commonly mentioned. Tai Lam Tunnel (West Rail Line) is also a completely bare-bones stub with poor sourcing that would need to be sorted out before it could be considered a primary topic. – NULL ‹talk›
‹edits› 20:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC)- Railway tunnels are usually lesser known since people identify them by the names of the railway lines. Jeremy (talk) 10:29, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Advertisement
[edit]Can someone PLEASE revert to the point where it wasn't changed by R3CPS? (R3CPS (Route 3 CPS) is actually a company for Route 3, website link here) It doesn't look very good with all that information about how good it is, how about some REFERENCES to actually prove it? Jc86035 (talk) 05:40, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, never mind about the last bit, but it still needs some improvement. Jc86035 (talk) 08:44, 24 September 2012 (UTC)