This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
Seems like this page ought to be merged with Taensa Indians, or the other way around.. I'd prefer the article name as "Taensa" rather than "Taensa Indians", even though that page has more text. Pfly00:42, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This section is in large part lifted verbatim, without attribution, from the Mooney 1912 article, "Taensa Indians" in the The Catholic Encyclopedia. I am rectifying this by changing it to block quotes, for now. Further work can be done to return it to standard prose, but note, I will check to ensure that the plagiarism is not returned. Whether out of copyright or in, if ideas, prose, etc. are taken from a source, the standard for doing honest written work is to cite the source (regardless of what you have heard, or what other editors allow to happen here). Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 19:07, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Jesu wept, that may be the worse case of tag bombing I have ever seen in 9 years on this site. Bad use of sourcing from Cath Enc or not, if you had spent half as much effort finding other sources and fixing the article as you did tag bombing the shit out of it you could have fixed the damned thing. Heiro00:20, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]