Jump to content

Talk:Tabloid Junkie/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    I made a number of copy-edits[1] to correct elementary grammatical mistakes, spelling, readability and style. Please consider enlisting help for copy-editing before nominating articles at WP:GAN.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    All online sources are live., properly formatted, substantiate the statements and appear to be reliable sources.
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Sufficeint coverage of the subject and focussed on it.
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    NPOV
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    No images used
  5. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    OK, this ticks all the boxes, so I am happy to pass this as a Good Article. Congratulations. But remember to get articles copy-edited before submitting them. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:11, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]