Talk:Tabloid Junkie/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- All online sources are live., properly formatted, substantiate the statements and appear to be reliable sources.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Sufficeint coverage of the subject and focussed on it.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- NPOV
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- No images used
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- OK, this ticks all the boxes, so I am happy to pass this as a Good Article. Congratulations. But remember to get articles copy-edited before submitting them. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:11, 4 April 2010 (UTC)