Talk:Tabley House/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 17:00, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
- I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 17:00, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Initial comments
[edit]Yesterday I had a quick read of the article and my first impressions were that this was a good article. I tweaked the grammer of the WP:Lead a bit and added a couple or so of wiklinks.
I'm now going to work my way through the article section by section, but leaving the lead until last. I may fix any minor problems as I go, so I will only be highlighting any "problems" that I can't or won't fix. Pyrotec (talk) 10:05, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
Overall summary
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
An informative, well-referenced, well-illustrated article.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Well referenced.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Well referenced.
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Well illustrated.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Well illustrated.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations, another "Cheshire" GA. Pyrotec (talk) 10:38, 17 January 2011 (UTC)