Talk:TC Energy

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Alberta Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Energy Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

-- Under "Corporate Governance", this article discusses the "current members of the board of directors." Among these names, if you clicked on "David O'Brien", you discover that this director was an actor, and that he died in 1989... making it unlikely that this is the same "David O'Brien" that is on the BoD for TransCanada. Thrantos 19:38, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Biased?

Why is the Keystone XL Pipeline the first section of this article? Why is there hardly any history or background on this company? This seems more and more like a PR stunt.70.79.10.110 (talk) 19:52, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keystone v's Keystone XL

There is a section in this article called Keystone. But the "Keystone" pipeline is an existing, legacy, pipeline, and the proposed "Keystone XL" or "Extra Large", is a different (as-yet-to-be-built) pipeline:

http://www.transcanada.com/oil-pipelines.html

v's

http://www.transcanada.com/keystone.html

Bad articles leads to bad judgment?

143.120.99.10 (talk) 01:06, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of material critical of TransCanada

Edits by Paperfire yesterday to the TransCanada Corporation article removed the following sections: Keystone Pipeline, Emininent Domain, Protests, Spills, British Colombia gas export pipelines, Proposed Oakville Generating Station that provided critical perspectives on the company. I've left a message on their talk page asking for an explanation. Strangely their user page is just the company article. Here's the direct link to the revision I am referring to: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=TransCanada_Corporation&type=revision&diff=830412928&oldid=822746894&diffmode=source mennonot (talk)

Response: I rewrote the entire article and removed both outdated and insignificant information. In recognition of your concerns, I added a criticism section.

I've added back in some of the sections you deleted on March 14. Full details of that deletion here: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=TransCanada_Corporation&oldid=830252292

Removal of material critical of TransCanada, Part 2

Paperfire, can you explain this edit here?: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=TransCanada_Corporation&type=revision&diff=831262823&oldid=831083803&diffmode=source

The article referenced in the article is clearly critical of TransCanada:

https://www.pressreader.com/canada/vancouver-sun/20171101/281930248243140

Rather than rephrase this critical perspective, you just removed it.

Are you being paid to edit this page? If so, please note that Wikipedia has a Paid Contribution disclosure policy which you can read here: Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure mennonot (talk)