Talk:TATB
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Correction of incorrect text or diagram
[edit]NH2 / H2N groups referenced in opening paragraph and molecular diargram do not match. Which is it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:B91E:D101:4C87:335E:23EF:45B9 (talk) 17:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Removal of (possibly) incorrect information.
[edit]The article claimed that most US nukes used TATB. This is contradicted an article from LLNL saying that "the conventional HE in older weapon systems can be sensitive to extreme shocks," and going on to explain they would possibly incorporate it in the W78 LEP. <ref>[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joelwilliamson (talk • contribs) 14:02, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Articles with conflicting quality ratings
- C-Class chemicals articles
- Low-importance chemicals articles
- Start-Class Explosives articles
- Mid-importance Explosives articles
- Start-Class Occupational Safety and Health articles
- Low-importance Occupational Safety and Health articles
- WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health articles