Talk:T. Mohandas Pai
 | A news item involving T. Mohandas Pai was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 8 August 2022. |  |
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | A fact from T. Mohandas Pai appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 August 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:40, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Indian philanthropist and business executive T. Mohandas Pai has been called the "architect of modern Manipal"? Source: The Hindu
Created by Ktin (talk). Self-nominated at 17:35, 12 August 2022 (UTC).
Hi Ktin, review follows: article created 6 AUgust and exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to what look to be reliable sources for the material cited; I didn't pick up on any overly close paraphrasing from the sources; hook fact is interesting enough for me, mentioned in the article and checks our to source cited. Just awaiting a QPQ and this will be good to go - Dumelow (talk) 18:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Ktin and Dumelow: Note that it's been over seven days since the nomination and a QPQ has not yet been done. Per a recent rule change, a DYK may be closed as unsuccessful if a QPQ is not provided within seven days of a nomination and a reminder to the nominator. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:12, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Dumelow and Narutolovehinata5: I believe the 7 days should start since the review date? It has been two days since the review date. I am currently in the middle of some high pressure deadlines at work and will be able to get to this over the weekend. Hope that works. Please let me know if you see any issues. Ktin (talk) 15:44, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Ktin: WP:DYK says it should be a week after a review + a reminder. So ideally, the review should have been done within seven days of the nomination. In practice, reviewers usually give around another week after the review or reminder before ultimately marking for closure. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 20:42, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5 and Dumelow: OK. So, it is a week from August 16 (since then it has been two days) and we are good here? Ktin (talk) 21:12, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- Pretty much. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 22:07, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- No rush from me Ktin, sometimes real life takes priority. Cheers - Dumelow (talk) 06:16, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Dumelow: many thanks for the understanding Dumelow. Much appreciated. QPQ added. Ktin (talk) 15:40, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
All good here - Dumelow (talk) 07:22, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Dumelow: many thanks for the understanding Dumelow. Much appreciated. QPQ added. Ktin (talk) 15:40, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- No rush from me Ktin, sometimes real life takes priority. Cheers - Dumelow (talk) 06:16, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Pretty much. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 22:07, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5 and Dumelow: OK. So, it is a week from August 16 (since then it has been two days) and we are good here? Ktin (talk) 21:12, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Ktin: WP:DYK says it should be a week after a review + a reminder. So ideally, the review should have been done within seven days of the nomination. In practice, reviewers usually give around another week after the review or reminder before ultimately marking for closure. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 20:42, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Dumelow and Narutolovehinata5: I believe the 7 days should start since the review date? It has been two days since the review date. I am currently in the middle of some high pressure deadlines at work and will be able to get to this over the weekend. Hope that works. Please let me know if you see any issues. Ktin (talk) 15:44, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Ktin and Dumelow: Note that it's been over seven days since the nomination and a QPQ has not yet been done. Per a recent rule change, a DYK may be closed as unsuccessful if a QPQ is not provided within seven days of a nomination and a reminder to the nominator. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:12, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
