Talk:Systems neuroscience

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neuroscience

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: COMPBIO Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Computational Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

06

06/08/06 I think we need to add things to this page, and make a distinction between the major branches of neuroscience. sluox

I agree. I think all the subfields should have a standalone page defining the subfield. I'm not sure though if there's much use in that list of (empty) topics though. The topics in systems neuroscience are the functions of each of the neural systems. Listing them to say something about each and keeping it fresh sounds like a task for Sissyphus! It might be better to have a "see also" list that links to more specific articles. That would also reduce redundancy. SJS1971 23:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved the {{neuroscience}} banner from the article to the talk page. Typically, these project banners are placed on an article's talk page, not in the article itself. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 15:20, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Content question

I rarely ever make changes or contribute much to wikipedia due to time constraints. Despite that, I wonder if the sentence beginning "Researchers concerned with systems neuroscience [...]" is a little bit too similar to the one found on MIT's page regarding Systems Neuroscience . Should this at least be acknowledged with a citation? T4exanadu 00:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Recategorizing

"Systems neuroscience" is basically an umbrella term, so the best way to use this article is as a pointer to articles that are more specific. Accordingly, I've rewritten the article a bit, and I'm reclassifying it as "Dab" (meaning "disambiguation"-class) rather than "Top" for Wikiproject Neuroscience. Looie496 (talk) 23:35, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Engineering in the 21st Century_Section 1

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2024 and 3 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Anmehra, 2024E102Group19 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Advancedpl12, Threemusketeerse102.

— Assignment last updated by Anmehra (talk) 01:30, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]